Re: nbd vs. failing HDDs (was Re: Status)

2011-09-09 Thread Brad Boyer
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:56:20PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Brad Boyer wrote: > > I still haven't found the time to get it working in Linux, but I did > > find and buy a 100BaseT NuBus card. It even has a chip on it that > > appears to be the same one as in some cards that a

Re: nbd vs. failing HDDs (was Re: Status)

2011-09-09 Thread Finn Thain
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:58:56PM +0200, Ingo J?rgensmann wrote: > > > > But yes, on Macs SCSI was always slow, afair... ;-) > > I still haven't found the time to get it working in Linux, but I did > find and buy a 100BaseT NuBus card. It even has a ch

Re: nbd vs. failing HDDs (was Re: Status)

2011-09-09 Thread Brad Boyer
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:58:56PM +0200, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:51:10 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > >I doubt m68k machines will slow down because of NBD. The very > >first NBD > >installation that I did was on quickstep, back when its SCSI > >driver was > >still rathe