Re: Bug#608247: dpkg-architecture is slow

2011-04-26 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 17:08:14 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Raphael Hertzog dixit: > > It seems really that perl is just slow on your setup. > > Yes, I thought so. Well, w/o specific profiling data I don't think we can do much, as Raphaël already said. And the architecture being generally

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04/26/2011 09:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and p

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Kurt Roeckx, le Tue 26 Apr 2011 21:28:57 +0200, a écrit : > Is there a reason not to switch the remaining (release) arches > (ia64, kfreebsd-*, sparc, s390)? Maybe hurd-i386 too? There's no real reason to defer hurd-i386, as it's basically like i386, and the key packages (glibc/hurd/gnumach) alre

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I'll make GCC 4.6 the > > default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at > > least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. > > If you do the switch

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Matthias Klose dixit: > At this point, pretty well after the GCC 4.6.0 release, I would like to avoid > switching more architectures to 4.5, but rather get rid of GCC 4.5 to reduce > maintenance efforts on the debian-gcc side, even before the multiarch changes Porters side, too. I’m okay with kee

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 04/17/2011 09:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:34 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the > >>next > >>two weeks before more transitions

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of >> GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and >> powerpc. > > Could you include armhf in the list as w

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04/26/2011 05:31 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose wrote: I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. Could you include armhf in the list as well? yes, forgot a

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of > GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and > powerpc. Could you include armhf in the list as well? Thanks Konstantinos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04/17/2011 09:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:34 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the next two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the default compiler for almost any other d