[m68k] Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-03-02 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Brian Morris dixit: >I noticed the other day that a new dependency (MPC) from upstream for gcc4.5 > >http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html > >is failing to build on 68k, >see m68k at the bottom of this page, says not since gcc 4.3. While I can probably take care of compiling gcc-4.5 and its dep

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02.03.2011 17:54, Martin Guy wrote: > On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose wrote: >> armel (although optimized for a different processor) > > Hi > For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean > optimized-for, or only-runs-on? > I ask in case this would mean dumping

Re: Mac RTC, was Re: 2.6.37 and other things.

2011-03-02 Thread Richard
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:31:48AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > At present, if MacOS is not in use, you can just use UTC. Whereas, the > kernel would have to store the timezone in PRAM when it wrote to the RTC > if were to depend on a valid timezone there. And I'm not sure that the > kernel even

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-03-02 Thread Martin Guy
On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose wrote: >  armel (although optimized for a different processor) Hi For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean optimized-for, or only-runs-on? I ask in case this would mean dumping all the armv4t systems that are using Debian armel.

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02.03.2011 07:36, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On 2 March 2011 03:34, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the >> next >> two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the >> default >> compiler for almost