680?0, was Re: g++-4.4 failings

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Kolbj?rn Barmen wrote: > > Other than that - who wouldn't want Freescale to put out one last > bad-ass m68k for us all... ah *dreaming* :) I'd be happy with a synthesizable '040 core. Free 68000 cores already exist: http://www.experiment-s.de/en/atari-ste-in-a-chip/ http

Re: g++-4.4 failings

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Kolbjørn Barmen dixit: > > >Pardon my ignorance - what is m68080? > > An obvious typo for 68060… or a confusion between left and right hand > while typing… whatever ☺ Ah, ok :) I got a bit suspicious, since googling for m68080 actually put up some