Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread fthain
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Wouter Verhelst dixit: > > >could we look into re-bootstrapping the port and starting to build > > I?m currently building gcc-4.4 and other up-to-date packages. Once I get > gcc-4.4 to work ... we can ask doko to put the patches into 4.4. > > Then

Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Wouter Verhelst dixit: >could we look into re-bootstrapping the port and starting to build I’m currently building gcc-4.4 and other up-to-date packages. Once I get gcc-4.4 to work (got multiarch/multilib working, but libfortran can't be built for -mfidoa due to incompatible inline assembly in a s

Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:33:54PM +1000, fth...@telegraphics.com.au wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Does anyone know what the status of this support is in libc? > > This was the situation a month ago-- > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2010/03/msg00014.html Righ

Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Well, motivation is somewhat lower after not being an official part of > > Debian anymore, but I still like m68k and would keep my machines running. > I could revive some hosts, too, though it would involve some work. > But the p

Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread fthain
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Does anyone know what the status of this support is in libc? This was the situation a month ago-- http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2010/03/msg00014.html It appears that the eglibc repo has the patches in HEAD now. Finn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:05:39PM +0200, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:43:29AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Or have we collectively lost interest and should we just let it die? > > Well, motivation is somewhat lower after not being an official part of > Debian anymo

Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread Ingo Jürgensmann
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:43:29AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Or have we collectively lost interest and should we just let it die? Well, motivation is somewhat lower after not being an official part of Debian anymore, but I still like m68k and would keep my machines running. So, when there's

gcc 4.5 and TLS

2010-04-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi all, GCC 4.5 was released not so long ago, and one of the new features listed on its changes page[1] is TLS support for m68k/ColdFire. Does anyone know what the status of this support is in libc? If so, could we look into re-bootstrapping the port and starting to build up-to-date packages agai