Re: debian kernel m68k patches for 2.6.29

2009-04-16 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi Petr, > > There's something wrong with the Atari FAT option code then - this is what > > I get > > with atari=yes on the first of your partitions (128MB?): > > 255 MB, IIRC (same sector/cluster size as 128 MB) Right - > > FAT (before atari): FAT bits 0 clusters 32622 sectors 65280 > > F

Re: Linux/m68k on Atari

2009-04-16 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi Geert, > > Geert, Roman: does paging_init rely on part of the first memory chunk being > > mapped in head.S, or just part of the chunk the kernel resides in? Could I > > reorder the m68k_memory[] elements in setup.c to fix the ordering problems? > > Should work. config_amiga() removes Zorro II

Re: [rt.debian.org #1132] crest and kullervo admin address

2009-04-16 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > is there an email address (role account/list/alias/whatever) that will > > > be the contact point for whoever will take over crest and kullervo from > > > DSA? Christian, Michael? > > > > Please use schmitz-cr...@debian.org and schmitz-kulle...@debian.org, I'll > > dispatch as necessary (a

Re: [rt.debian.org #1132] crest and kullervo admin address

2009-04-16 Thread c...@debian.org via RT
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:15:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > > is there an email address (role account/list/alias/whatever) that will > > be the contact point for whoever will take over crest and kullervo from > > DSA? Christian, Michael? > > Please use schmitz-cr...@debian.org an

Re: [rt.debian.org #1132] crest and kullervo admin address

2009-04-16 Thread Peter Palfrader via RT
Michael Schmitz schrieb am Donnerstag, dem 16. April 2009: > Hi, > > > is there an email address (role account/list/alias/whatever) that will > > be the contact point for whoever will take over crest and kullervo from > > DSA? Christian, Michael? > > Please use schmitz-cr...@debian.org and sch

Re: Linux/m68k on Atari

2009-04-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:22, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> > Anyway: do you have a section like this in your log? >> > >> > Ignoring memory chunk at 0x0:0xe0 before the first chunk >> > Fix your bootloader or use a memfile to make use of this area! >> >> Yes, I have this message in my log. Full

Re: debian kernel m68k patches for 2.6.29

2009-04-16 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > Atari GEMDOS and Atari partition programs always use 2 sectors per > cluster. Since FAT16 can hold max 32k entries you can compute the rest > of information from this (example: 63 MB partition needs 2 kB clusters > to fit into 32k cluster limit so the logical sector size for 32-63 MB > parti

Re: debian kernel m68k patches for 2.6.29

2009-04-16 Thread Petr Stehlik
Michael Schmitz píše v Čt 16. 04. 2009 v 09:45 +0200: > There's something wrong with the Atari FAT option code then - this is what I > get > with atari=yes on the first of your partitions (128MB?): 255 MB, IIRC (same sector/cluster size as 128 MB) > FAT (before atari): FAT bits 0 clusters 32622