Re: debian kernel m68k patches for 2.6.29

2009-04-15 Thread Petr Stehlik
Michael Schmitz píše v Čt 16. 04. 2009 v 01:38 +0200: > > What if I created a disk image with 15, 31, 63, 127, 255 and 511 MB > > partitions and sent it to you? Would you please list what partition > > sizes are mountable with _and_ without the Atari FAT patch that we are > > discussing here? That

Re: debian kernel m68k patches for 2.6.29

2009-04-15 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > > Small partitions I can mount as regular MSDOS FAT (-o atari=no) only, > > unless > > they are <32 MB (in which case it's a 16 bit FAT with few enough clusters > > to be > > treated as 16 bit FAT by the Atari FAT patch). > > I don't think I understand it. It is a bit weird, yes. I may

Re: debian/m68k's future

2009-04-15 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > > Survival of the port may ultimately depend more on attracting new helpers > > than > > on re-inclusion in the main distribution. > > I'm inclined to agree. I think we'd have to have a whole lot more > interest and support in the port to make it back into sid. Things seem > to be head

Re: [rt.debian.org #1132] crest and kullervo admin address

2009-04-15 Thread Michael Schmitz via RT
Hi, > is there an email address (role account/list/alias/whatever) that will > be the contact point for whoever will take over crest and kullervo from > DSA? Christian, Michael? Please use schmitz-cr...@debian.org and schmitz-kulle...@debian.org, I'll dispatch as necessary (anything that requi