Re: debian/m68k's future

2009-04-11 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi All, > > Option 2: lenny-lite > >        Build lenny with base, build-essential, and buildd-required > >        packages. I can probably do this one myself if there's > >        interest. I'll probably include anything required for d-i > >        too. > > > > Probably the sanest option, most o

Re: Linux/m68k on Atari

2009-04-11 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > > I think I reported first FastRAM problems like 10-12 years ago. The > > symptoms were that time was running much faster (the bogomips value was > > 3-4 times higher than normal) and there were many spurious interrupts > > (/proc/interrupts). And the IDE was not running correctly (because

Re: debian/m68k's future

2009-04-11 Thread Michael Casadevall
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > So you may have noticed the following in your buildd logs for python- > depending packages. > > | dpkg: regarding .../python-docutils_0.5-3_all.deb containing > python-docutils: > |  package uses Breaks; not supported in this dpkg > | dp

Re: debian/m68k's future

2009-04-11 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Brad Boyer wrote: > Would you say the missing TLS/NPTL for glibc is the biggest problem? I > thought there were some people working on it, which is why I stopped > even thinking about it. I know I don't spend much time on m68k work, > but I'm sure I could find a little time to