Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-11-05 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > > > case. Given that the lock handling of IDE may be dodgy, that scares > me a bit. > > > > Reasons enough for you? > > Oops. It was not my intention to offend anyone. Excuses if I did. No offense taken, I assure you :-) > > > I'll focus on getting SCSI fixed, first and foremost. First

Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-11-05 Thread Frank P. Szymanski
Hi, > > The reasons for this are: > > EtherNEC needs to be rewritten based on the current ne.c code. I'm not sure if > > ... > > processing before the ethernet device has been opened. > > I did recently rewrite the EtherNAT driver based on the current smc91x.c one. > > ... > > work out. > > > >

Re: Crest, Kullervo & security

2008-11-05 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Some time ago Peter Palfrader from DSA asked me by mail how to proceed with > Crest & Kullervo. He would like to get rid off it (DSA-wise) and hand it > over to us. Administration can be done by us I guess. > I mentioned this issue shortly during the Kiel Meeting and said that I would > like

Re: Crest, Kullervo & security

2008-11-05 Thread Luk Claes
Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Hi! > > Some time ago Peter Palfrader from DSA asked me by mail how to proceed with > Crest & Kullervo. He would like to get rid off it (DSA-wise) and hand it > over to us. > I mentioned this issue shortly during the Kiel Meeting and said that I would > like to have at

Crest, Kullervo & security

2008-11-05 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Some time ago Peter Palfrader from DSA asked me by mail how to proceed with Crest & Kullervo. He would like to get rid off it (DSA-wise) and hand it over to us. I mentioned this issue shortly during the Kiel Meeting and said that I would like to have at least one DD-accessible machine for all