Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:47:41PM +0200, Frank P. Szymanski wrote: > >> The only disadvantage is that I still don't have a running debian/m68k > >> machine due to the fact that the installer refused to work on my machine. > > Where did it fail? :) > > Actually, I don't remember. It has been half

Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Frank P. Szymanski
>> The only disadvantage is that I still don't have a running debian/m68k >> machine due to the fact that the installer refused to work on my machine. > Where did it fail? :) Actually, I don't remember. It has been half a year ago or more. At the moment I am waiting for my ct63 so I can use the fa

Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:39:20PM +0200, Frank P. Szymanski wrote: > The only disadvantage is that I still don't have a running debian/m68k > machine due to the fact that the installer refused to work on my machine. Where did it fail? :) Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not

Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Frank P. Szymanski
Hi Michael, > And I was wondering all the time who the Atari expert was who didn't > make it to the meeting :-) ;-) >>> Is there a MiNT driver for the USB port on the EtherNAT as well? That >>> might be useful to tackle next. >> Unfortunately not. There is only a closed source beta mouse driver.

Please reupload unifont (unifont_5.1.20080914-1_m68k.changes)

2008-09-16 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, about : unifont_5.1.20080914-1_m68k.changes Can porter to m68k re-upload this? I did sponsor uploaded with amd64 packages. So the following from anthony is m64k porter issue. (d-devel post exists too.) On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:45:20PM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > Osamu and Anthony: > > O

Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Kolbjørn Barmen
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:13:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > What would the device name for a CD be in AmigaOS? > > That's rather free to choose. > > > Fine, so all we'd need to know is the path to the install script on the > > CD as se

Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:13:11AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > AmigaOS has 2 choices for paths: Basically 3 choices: > - paths involving the device name (which may depend on the driver) > - paths involving the volume name (the label) - paths involving an assign name (assign cd0: cdr

Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:13:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > What would the device name for a CD be in AmigaOS? That's rather free to choose. > Fine, so all we'd need to know is the path to the install script on the > CD as seen by AmigaOS? Or does it correctly try to launch the script of