Re: RFH: strace FTBFS

2008-07-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:40:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:07:00AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > For the record I've been installing linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-6 on the > > buildds and marking it hold. This solved ftbfs for strace and insight at > > le

Re: RFH: strace FTBFS

2008-07-25 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi! On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:07:00AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > For the record I've been installing linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-6 on the > buildds and marking it hold. This solved ftbfs for strace and insight at > least. AFAIK the issue causing this build failure was fixed in libc6-dev 2.7-11.

Re: RFH: strace FTBFS

2008-07-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:15:14AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:02:01AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I need some help to fix the strace FTBFS: > > > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=strace&ver=4.5.16%2Bcvs20080708-2&arch=m68k&stamp=12165

Re: Updating Sarge

2008-07-25 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:07:10AM +1000, stephen wrote: > At the start of the year/late last year I installed Sarge 3.1r3 onto my A3000 > before I had a network card. > > I would now like to update the system to at least cover updates for 3.1 and > if > it's still supported etch. Just so you

Re: Updating Sarge

2008-07-25 Thread Michael Casadevall
Sarge has been retired as a distribution. If you want something supported, you need to go to etch. On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:17 AM, stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 13 July 2008 18:06:13 Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > > At the start of the year/late last year I installed Sarge 3.1r3 on

Re: Updating Sarge

2008-07-25 Thread stephen
On Sunday 13 July 2008 18:06:13 Laurent Vivier wrote: > > At the start of the year/late last year I installed Sarge 3.1r3 onto > > my A3000 before I had a network card. [...] > > What is the correct /etc/apt/sources.list server's syntax I should > > be using? > > Do you use etch-m68k instead of et