Re: nfblock vs udev

2008-07-18 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to detecting the proper hardware, instead of stuffing up the ROM-port card or just hanging the kernel). Does Geert have this in his queue yet? No. Where'

Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > Sigh - seems like Christian and I are the logical suspects... [â?¦] > nvram and atari-fdisk may still be useful (what take have the > installer people on the latter?). Recent work on supporting Atari in the debian-installer was done by Stephen R. Marenka (CCed). I'm aware of Stephen's w

Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Brad Boyer
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:35:44PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > nvsetenv (provided by nvram, IIRC) is used by quik-installer for > powermac-oldworld. Uploaders for the later are Colin Watson and Wouter > Verhelst. No, the nvsetenv program on powerpc is provided by the powerpc-utils package. This

Re: wanna-build vs. m68k

2008-07-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I have w-b access and I'm syncing state info. So please don't start using w-b quite yet. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: nfblock vs udev

2008-07-18 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll > > have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to > > detecting the proper hardware, ins

Re: nfblock vs udev

2008-07-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll > have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to > detecting the proper hardware, instead of stuffing up the ROM-port card > or just hang

Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:36:08AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >While I was going through the list of orphaned packages which > >have not a correct maintainer field yet (i.e. > >http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html) I noticed three fairly > >m68k specific packages are on the list: > > > >atari-fd

Re: wanna-build vs. m68k

2008-07-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:33:40AM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:59:19 -0500 > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], which expands to all of the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] aliases. [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], with special exim rewrit

Re: wanna-build vs. m68k

2008-07-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Bouncing to the list so ya'll can see the whole reply. On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:33:40AM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:59:19 -0500 > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please find attached the ssh keys and email addresses of the 23 current > > m68k buildds. I

Re: Adopters for m68k specific packages?

2008-07-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:36:08AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > >> While I was going through the list of orphaned packages which >> have not a correct maintainer field yet (i.e. >> http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html) I noticed three fairly >> m68k specific packages are on the list: >> >> a