Re: status of gcc-4.3 build?

On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:55:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > please could somebody of you give some estimatates when the gcc-4.3 > build will hit the archive (if it is still building)? It's currently still building on Crest for 6d15:37:42 now (see http://unstable.buildd.net/index-m68k.html)

status of gcc-4.3 build?

please could somebody of you give some estimatates when the gcc-4.3 build will hit the archive (if it is still building)? thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: perl problems

On Fri, 9 May 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: So we haven't managed to build any version of perl >= 5.10. [ ... some errors deleted ... ] t/op/int.t | not ok 8 # int(4294967303.15) is -2147483648, not 4294967303 | not ok 9 # int(4294967303.15) is -2147483648, not -4294967303 | not ok 11 # int

Looking for help with maintainance of a package

Dear people, I am the maintainer of hfsprogs, which is a package taken from Apple's Darwin code that provides a mkfs.hfs{,plus} and, more importantly, fsck.hfs{,plus}. Unfortunately, the present version has problems not being 64-bit clean and, as a result, I had to restrict the list of architectu

perl problems

So we haven't managed to build any version of perl >= 5.10. This was built under aranym, if that matters. If ya'll think it's worth it, I can copy it to a non-aranym box and run the tests there (or even build it from scratch). I was looking at the test failures and here are the relevant portions