Re: find segfault

2008-01-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 08:37:36PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > In current sid executing 'find /usr/bin -type d -o -ls' results in a > > > segfault. This

Re: find segfault

2008-01-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > In current sid executing 'find /usr/bin -type d -o -ls' results in a > > segfault. This works fine in etch-m68k. > > > > Anyone care to followup? > > Having a

Re: find segfault

2008-01-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > In current sid executing 'find /usr/bin -type d -o -ls' results in a > segfault. This works fine in etch-m68k. > > Anyone care to followup? Having a look at it now. -- Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-d

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:03:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > I fired up tanda again, but it has this problem: > > > > > > gcc-4.2: Depen

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:03:07AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I fired up tanda again, but it has this problem: > > > > gcc-4.2: Depends: gcc-4.2-base (= 4.2.2-3) but 4.2.2-4 is to be installed > >Depend

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:07:37AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > We seem

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:07:37AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a > > > good time to get

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a > > good time to get all your buildds fired up and running. > > If you need some debian-install

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Some packages are built quite regularly like bouml, which takes some days to > > build. We maybe should postpone such sort of packages in order to build > > packages that weren't built for a long time? > Does there exist some

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a > > good time to get all your buildds fired up and running. > > If you need some debian-installer help, please let m

Re: [buildd] needs-build @ 914

2008-01-22 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > We seem to be losing ground on the needs-build. This would be a > good time to get all your buildds fired up and running. > If you need some debian-installer help, please let me know. > Even with the fpu bugs, do ya'll think arany