Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:41:32PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > The current failure is here (for amiga, atari, maybe more): > > > > CC drivers/ide/ide-lib.o > > drivers/ide/ide-lib.c: In function `ide_dump_atapi_status': > > drivers/ide/ide-lib.c:601: internal compiler error: in

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > There is a clue hidden here for what the real problem is, maybe you can > > solve the puzzle? > > Perhaps you have `CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-m68k"' in your .config? Nope, but I think this is due to 133-arch.diff. I think it cros

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > There is a clue hidden here for what the real problem is, maybe you can > > > solve the puzzle? > > > > Perhaps you have `CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-m68k"' in your .config? > >

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Kars said he can test on blz1260, I have a blz2060 (and a gvp series2 which > > I don't really use for anything). > > Good to know. If I would find time, blz2060 would be the first driver to > tackle (as suggested by `wc -l' ;-)... Now that's a metrics of complexity that needs some deeper anal

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Erm, that's the same driver as in A4000Ts and on the WarpEngine? > No, A4000T and Warp Engine have a NCR53c7xx. Ah, ok... I just remembered something with 53c..something... ;) -- Ciao... Ingo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > With the exception of the mac driver, we might be able to unify the > > > various Amiga 53C9x variants (DMA handling being the main difference among > > > them). Do we have te

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > With the exception of the mac driver, we might be able to unify the > > various Amiga 53C9x variants (DMA handling being the main difference among > > them). Do we have testers for all the variants of Amiga SCSI around? > K

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:36:46AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > How close are we to releasing 2.6.25? I have yet to start on the ESP > > > > rewrite ... > > > > > > As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March. > > > >

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 02:36:46AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi, > > > > How close are we to releasing 2.6.25? I have yet to start on the ESP > > > rewrite ... > > > > As we just got 2.6.24-rc7, I expect 2.6.25 near the end of March. > > Fair enough. Even though it's just a microsecond on t