Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

> > Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built > > the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so > > It did. And uploaded. 680 packages in the queue now... way to go! Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: aranym vs atafb

> > If Fast RAM doesn't support DMA > > VIDEL has just 23 address wires... Sure, that's why we need to make sure the frame buffer is addressable by these 23 bits. > > it should be added as non-DMA'ble memory. > > where can this be set? The bootstrap uses the following struct for > passing the ava

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

> > Anyway, end of rant. It's building pwlib now. There's a perl build running > > as well so it may be a bit slower than usually. > > Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built > the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so It did. > th

Re: aranym vs atafb

Hi, > > > So the question is how the atafb decides where to put the videoram and > > > why is it related to FastRAM size... Because __get_free_pages and friends allocate memory off the top of RAM? Would that explain the behavior? > > > > I have just 2.6.22 source and there the screen_base is set

Re: aranym vs atafb

Geert Uytterhoeven píše v Pá 28. 12. 2007 v 14:27 +0100: > If Fast RAM doesn't support DMA VIDEL has just 23 address wires... > it should be added as non-DMA'ble memory. where can this be set? The bootstrap uses the following struct for passing the available memory to kernel and it doesn't cont

Re: wanna-build state of dpkg is bogus

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:54:16AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Please someone start the build of dpkg, the dep-wait set by wanna-build > > > is

Re: [buildd] hugin build

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:53:35AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Hi! > > I recommend that hugin is added to weak-no-auto for machines with less than > 128 MB of RAM at least. That's currently just spice and zeus. > It uses lots of swap, which is basically ok, but it does a lot of swapping, >

Re: wanna-build state of dpkg is bogus

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > Hi > > > > Please someone start the build of dpkg, the dep-wait set by wanna-build > > is bogus. > > Did that earlier today. Two seconds later, kullervo took it :-) A

Re: aranym vs atafb

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Stephen R Marenka píše v St 26. 12. 2007 v 15:40 -0600: > > > I've been trying to get d-i initrds to work with aranym without > > trashing the screen [0]. I noticed something interesting in my testing > > today. > > > > [0]

Re: aranym vs atafb

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Petr Stehlik p��e v P� 28. 12. 2007 v 10:42 +0100: > > 128 MB: screen_base 00b0 > > 192 MB: screen_base 0170 > > 256 MB: screen_base 0160 > > > > So the question is how the atafb decides where to put the videoram and > > why is it related to F

Re: aranym vs atafb

Petr Stehlik píše v Pá 28. 12. 2007 v 10:42 +0100: > 128 MB: screen_base 00b0 > 192 MB: screen_base 0170 > 256 MB: screen_base 0160 > > So the question is how the atafb decides where to put the videoram and > why is it related to FastRAM size... I have just 2.6.22 source and there the

Re: aranym vs atafb

Michael Schmitz píše v Pá 28. 12. 2007 v 04:09 +0100: > That does probably steal our precious ST-RAM space. > > I guess I'll have to just allocate the required ST-RAM for atafb early Look at this: 64 MB of FastRAM: Memory: 68184k/68252k available (1956k kernel code, 9568k data, 100k init) a

Re: wanna-build state of dpkg is bogus

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Please someone start the build of dpkg, the dep-wait set by wanna-build > is bogus. Did that earlier today. Two seconds later, kullervo took it :-) -- Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 20

Re: aranym vs atafb

Stephen R Marenka píše v St 26. 12. 2007 v 15:40 -0600: > I've been trying to get d-i initrds to work with aranym without > trashing the screen [0]. I noticed something interesting in my testing > today. > > [0] > > With the same kernel (2.6.18-4)

wanna-build state of dpkg is bogus

Hi Please someone start the build of dpkg, the dep-wait set by wanna-build is bogus. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[buildd] hugin build

Hi! I recommend that hugin is added to weak-no-auto for machines with less than 128 MB of RAM at least. That's currently just spice and zeus. It uses lots of swap, which is basically ok, but it does a lot of swapping, i.e. it permanently swaps in and out instead of swapping some data in, doing st