On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I'm just wondering if there is a way to redirect DNS queries for crest to
> > a dyndns service without the debian.org DNS getting involved in dynamic
> > DNS itself ...
> Having thought about that for a while, I am sure that a CN
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Routing/VPN off Duesseldorf would give you a quasi static address (we
> > would need to put a similar mechanism in place to update the route entry,
> > whereas for VPN you would just have to reopen the tunnel after an IP
> > cha
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Routing/VPN off Duesseldorf would give you a quasi static address (we
> would need to put a similar mechanism in place to update the route entry,
> whereas for VPN you would just have to reopen the tunnel after an IP
> change).
I c
Following up on the crazy idea:
> > Correct. So the IP numbers will have to change sometime, once we have new
> > hosting, but I wont promise that this will be possible this year...
>
> Either way, let's fix the DNS - and keep the TTL low so a change will be
> instantaneous.
>
> I'm just wondering
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:03:07AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >> > With the move of kullervo and crest, crest.debian.org and
> >> > m68k.debian.org no longer resolve to anything. Should we punt these
> >> > addresses or fix them?
> >>
> >> As I understood Christian, Debian was looking for new
> > With the move of kullervo and crest, crest.debian.org and
> > m68k.debian.org no longer resolve to anything. Should we punt these
> > addresses or fix them?
>
> As I understood Christian, Debian was looking for new hosting facilities and
> the hosting behind the DSL (dynamic IPs) will only be
6 matches
Mail list logo
