On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> As Rolf Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> already pointed out on Mon, May 14:
>
> | I think I got the same with a self-compiled 2.6.17 on powerpc. The problem
> was
> | that the module x_tables was missing. Did you set CONFIG_NETFILTE
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:14:55AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:20:24PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:38:20PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > >
> > > Nope - we should perhaps verify it's a real regression first. Do you have
> >
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:20:24PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:38:20PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >
> > Nope - we should perhaps verify it's a real regression first. Do you have
> > a quick test case available? Does anyone have the previous known good
> >
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:19:23AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > The package did build successfully on m68k, as you can check yourself. Maybe
> > it will give you a hint, for what is missing on your system also:
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=iptables&ver=
> >
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:50:31AM -0400, L Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:19:23AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > The package did build successfully on m68k, as you can check yourself. Maybe
> > it will give you a hint, for what is missing on your system also:
> >
> > http://bu
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:19:23AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> The package did build successfully on m68k, as you can check yourself. Maybe
> it will give you a hint, for what is missing on your system also:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=iptables&ver=
>
> Christia
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:34:59PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> forgive me for intruding, I am just learning a little myself
> in networking and still getting confused.
>
> however, I just want to ask:
>
> a) is iptables now considered legacy code/method.
>
> b) are there newer packages/ softwar
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:19:23AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > I have now done 'apt-get build-dep initables'
>
> you mean "iptables"?
Yes. typo in message.
>
> > Unable to resolve dependency on linux/compiler.h. Try 'make clean'.
>
> you seem to be missing something
>...
>
>
> > Nope - we should perhaps verify it's a real regression first. Do you have
> > a quick test case available? Does anyone have the previous known good
> > version of binutils around?
>
> Which is a good version? My apt-cache/proxy have these versions:
>
> binutils_2.17-2+b2_m68k.deb
> binutils-dev
9 matches
Mail list logo