* Stephen R Marenka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070413 14:38]:
> It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
> need to do to get back in and release with lenny?
That are two different questions obviously. :)
1. To get back to testing: Basically, the release team didn't mind
Hi,
On Friday, April 13, 2007, at 02:25 PM, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:25:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh. Guess we ought to make sure that buildd
hosts
which still run 2.2 are either replaced or upgraded now.
Are there any 2.2 hosts left
Stephen R Marenka writes:
> Does anyone see any other toolchain issues (or other issues) besides
> TLS in libc?
the m68k related patches in gcc-4.2 need to be updated, test results
for gcc-snapshot be submitted.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:33:08PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:07:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > > It appears that m68k has been dropped fro
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:07:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
>
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
> > > need to do to get back in and release
Stephen R Marenka a écrit :
> It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
> need to do to get back in and release with lenny?
>
Some people working on the glibc to add TLS support?
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian develope
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
> > > need to do to get back in and
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
> > need to do to get back in and release with lenny?
>
> requalify?
And the
Hi,
On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
> need to do to get back in and release with lenny?
requalify?
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
need to do to get back in and release with lenny?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:25:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh. Guess we ought to make sure that buildd hosts
> > which still run 2.2 are either replaced or upgraded now.
>
> Are there any 2.2 hosts left? That would be Macs, most likely?
I've been running 2.6 for a w
> in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh. Guess we ought to make sure that buildd hosts
> which still run 2.2 are either replaced or upgraded now.
Are there any 2.2 hosts left? That would be Macs, most likely?
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
14 matches
Mail list logo
