On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:20:57PM +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> my non-free packages core++ and cgal have never been build on m68k. And
> they are not listed on
> http://non-free.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_Needs-Build.html . Is there a
> particular reason for this? If not, could you
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:38:30PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> Anyway, I'll certainly look into the IOP ADB problem. Hopefully it won't
> be as nasty as Egret ADB.
By comparison, IOP ADB is trivial. The problem is most likely in the
generic IOP code, which is really only used by IOP ADB at the mom
Адресная доставка на @мэйлы
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
289-5 ВОСЕМЬ 4-274
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear customer,
Thank you for your message. Due to the extraordinarily large number of
e-mails that we are currently receiving, it might take us up to several
days to reply to your request. We thank you for your patience and understanding,
and will get back to you as soon as possible.
With kind r
> > I see what you mean :-) There's a few obvious things like these:
> >
> > - sonic_write(dev, SONIC_ISR,0x7fff);
> > - sonic_write(dev, SONIC_IMR,0);
> > + SONIC_WRITE(SONIC_IMR, 0);
> > + SONIC_WRITE(SONIC_ISR, 0x7fff);
>
> It's funny you chose those lines. I still can't
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:10:03PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> My understanding was that IOP support works in 2.6 on a IIfx but fails
> miserably on the Q900/Q950. I do have a IIfx but not a Q900 or Q950. The
> IOP work was all originally done on a II
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Also, merging would be non-trivial, since the patch was rather large
> > (only partly because 2.6 was so far behind 2.2) --
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=efcce839360fb3a7b6dedeacaec80f68b0f
> > Can we back-port the sonic fix to 2.2? (ISTR it's been about moving device
> > start/stop calls around a bit; that should not depend on 2.6?)
>
> There's a fair amount of work in testing after backporting. I'd much
> rather put the effort into IOP ADB for 2.6 instead. Also, I have patches
> for
8 matches
Mail list logo
