On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:28:25AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> What kernel is jazz running?
The 2.2 from sarge.
> What kind of stability issues does the machine have?
panics under load. I once also had kswapd segfault (see
http://grep.be/blog/en/computer/debian/m68k/jazz_oops)
> Does there exist
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:58:54PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> ...
> > * Jazz is having stability issues with the kernel (it's a quadra 950,
> > dunno whether that's expected?)
I can't say I've tested that model. (I bought a 950 logic board on
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:58:54PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:54:17PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Personnally I would favor a location where it can serve as
> > a distcc server for real m68k buildds.
>
> There *might* be some space in the room in our office, wh
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:19:25AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Hmmm, sort of...
> > http://unstable.buildd.net/index-m68k.html shows some rough build time
> > estimation for all packages in needs-build:
> Well, what we'd need is twofold: a way to query that database for the
> estimated build
> > Ideally we'd have a massively parallel cluster of Amigas, Macs and Ataris
> > to do that. Right now, we'd be more than happy if additional machines
> > (real or emulated) could take up some of the backlog at times. We'd need
> > to prevent an emulated system attempting to build a CPU intensive
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:44:18AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > It is probably useful to compile things on a wide range of hardware in
> > order to look for driver and hardware problems. That said, finding
> > problems that are due to hardware failure are probably less useful. It
> > is nice
Michael Schmitz wrote:
(real or emulated) could take up some of the backlog at times. We'd need
to prevent an emulated system attempting to build a CPU intensive package,
I'd say that it's exactly the other way round - I personally would let
ARAnyM pick up the bigger/more resource hungry packa
> Some interesting points:
> - 68k emulation has been going on for more than 10 years.
Far more than that (10 years ago the 68k Macs were already being replaced
by PPC Macs, and a 68k Mac emulator was available for some time then (not
to mention Apple's own efforts )
> - http://www-gatago.com/lin
8 matches
Mail list logo
