emulation has fewer bugs than certain hardware

2007-03-09 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:57:07PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > > > 68k seems to have elected to skip official etch, but also seems to > > > > have met the requirements. Some of the non-dd porters still want > > > > an offic

Re: [D-I] ***IMPORTANT*** build of debian-installer delayed for m68k

2007-03-09 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > With a mounting backlog, I wouldn't know how to best get this done - > anyone holding back spare buildd capacity? We could use some cycles now... I'll try to get Arrakis back to work this weekend. It was the machine with the disk

Re: [D-I] ***IMPORTANT*** build of debian-installer delayed for m68k

2007-03-09 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Is this what you're holding out for, or should we schedule 1:4.3p2-9 on > > a testing buildd? > > Yes, that is what we are waiting for. The original build was on a machine > that had disk problems, which explains the delay. Wouter gave it back > around the same time I sent my previous mail. > >

Re: [D-I] ***IMPORTANT*** build of debian-installer delayed for m68k

2007-03-09 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 09 March 2007 09:25, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Automatic build of openssh_1:4.3p2-9 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 85 > Build started at 20070309-0152 > [...] > Finished at 20070309-0751 > Build needed 04:47:18, 25784k disk space > > Is this what you're holding out fo

Re: [D-I] ***IMPORTANT*** build of debian-installer delayed for m68k

2007-03-09 Thread Michael Schmitz
> I'm about to upload debian-installer for RC2. All is clear for all > architectures except m68k, which is missing the latest openssh > (1:4.3p2-9) in testing. Automatic build of openssh_1:4.3p2-9 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 85 Build started at 20070309-0152 [...] Finished at 20070