before flying back to California. If the pilot used the full width of the
river to turn,
Critical Care Inc,
symbl: .CTCX.
This one is an easy doubler
@ 65 cents wont last long
Expected target : $ 3.00
Critical Care Announces Expansion of Cost Containment Activities
Business Wire (Fri, Feb 16
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:48:25AM +0100, Christian Brandt wrote:
> >
>
>>> >>> OTOH, I would be willing to invest more machines, time and money in
>>> >>> keeping
>>> >>> the m68k port alive - regardless of being it a part of Debian or not.
>>> >>> Meaning: wi
> > So you want to bypass testing altogether, and instead upload to etch-m68k?
>
> Yes.
>
> The main problem with having our own "testing", as I see it, is syncing
> with the testing that already exists, and still being able to do
> sourceful uploads that are required for our arch-specific bugfixes
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:36:11PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
[...]
> > Later on, we talked about us not being part of etch, and what we could
> > do about that (basically, he asked me whether we were okay with him
> > dropping all m68k packages from stable once it released, which I
> > denied).
Hi,
> James Troup was at FOSDEM this weekend, and we talked a bit about the
> m68k situation there, amongst others. My first question was about the
> state of our buildd addition requests, and whether it was on purpose or
> so that none of them had been granted yet. He basically apologised for
> n
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:54:39AM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
> Please build vlc 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4 that was uploaded via
> testing-proposed-updates (tpu).
>
> I don't see where information about who's building tpu. This one package
> should fix a few of the uninstallable packa
Hi,
> Please build vlc 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4 that was uploaded via
> testing-proposed-updates (tpu).
>
> I don't see where information about who's building tpu. This one package
That would be because not many buildds for testing have been activated.
poseidon is listed; there may be others th
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:48:25AM +0100, Christian Brandt wrote:
> > OTOH, I would be willing to invest more machines, time and money in keeping
> > the m68k port alive - regardless of being it a part of Debian or not.
> > Meaning: with all those political background Debian incorporates, it may
Hi,
Please build vlc 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4 that was uploaded via
testing-proposed-updates (tpu).
I don't see where information about who's building tpu. This one package
should fix a few of the uninstallable packages listed at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_probs.html
I plan to
Speaking of discussions we need to have :)
Right now we don't have a bunch of distcc or aranym buildds. Do we want
to go there?
Distcc has it's limitations, including not the least of which that we
become somewhat dependent on cross-compilers. However, it's about the
only way we've been ab
* Ingo Juergensmann:
> OTOH, I would be willing to invest more machines, time and money in keeping
> the m68k port alive - regardless of being it a part of Debian or not.
> Meaning: with all those political background Debian incorporates, it may be
> worth a thought to fork the infrastructure and
11 matches
Mail list logo
