On 21/12/2006, at 5:52 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 20 déc. 06 à 14:40, Stephen R Marenka a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:07:27PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 20 déc. 06 à 11:21, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
[catching up on my huge mail backlog...]
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:33:48PM
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:01:33PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> OK, here's what I found out: The only piece that is missing from 2.6.18-8
> (and, presumably, -7) is actually switching on the config options for
> FB_ATARI, KEYBOARD_ATARI and MOUSE_ATARI. These options were not new,
> that's why
Le 20 déc. 06 à 14:40, Stephen R Marenka a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:07:27PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 20 déc. 06 à 11:21, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
[catching up on my huge mail backlog...]
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:33:48PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies
wrote:
For the mac
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:28:41AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> > Goswin von Brederlow pe v Po 27. 11. 2006 v 13:16 +0100:
> > > I tried out aranym (sid version) this weekend with the etch hd-image
> > > from the homepage and it
> > I think I had uploaded -7 just before I left, but I could not include
> > Michaels patches, since they would not apply to my tree. The easiest thing
> > for me would be if everything is in the CVS, I would then start building
> > 2.6.19.
>
> Roman has been making noises to that effect. I've not
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:07:27PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> Le 20 déc. 06 à 11:21, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
>
> >[catching up on my huge mail backlog...]
> >
> >On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:33:48PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> >>For the mac, there exists no directory in the instal
Le 20 déc. 06 à 11:21, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
[catching up on my huge mail backlog...]
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:33:48PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
For the mac, there exists no directory in the install folder, ie
no Penguin
boot loader, no bootargs, only the kernel image. Is thi
> > > Michaels patches, since they would not apply to my tree. The easiest thing
> > > for me would be if everything is in the CVS, I would then start building
> > > 2.6.19.
> >
> > Roman has been making noises to that effect. I've not run a cvs update
> > since; 2.6.19 is the way to go if we can a
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:46:30AM +0100, Alfred G. de Wijn wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> In two few weeks I will be moving from the Netherlands to the US. I
> will not be able to take my two vintage Macintoshes with me, so I'm
> putting them up for donation. I have the following hardware:
>
> - Ma
> > I was hoping Christian had built 2.6.18-5; that version should work.
>
> I think I had uploaded -7 just before I left, but I could not include
> Michaels patches, since they would not apply to my tree. The easiest thing
> for me would be if everything is in the CVS, I would then start building
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow píše v Po 27. 11. 2006 v 13:16 +0100:
> > I tried out aranym (sid version) this weekend with the etch hd-image
> > from the homepage and it looked fine. But when trying to upgrade I got
> > illegal instructions on
[catching up on my huge mail backlog...]
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:33:48PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> For the mac, there exists no directory in the install folder, ie no Penguin
> boot loader, no bootargs, only the kernel image. Is this enough to boot a
> mac with emile? I did not find
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 09:51:23AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >>First, there was a theory that "ramdisk_size" is no longer needed with
> >>2.6.x kernels. That's wrong, unfortunately:
> >
> >It's right when using initramfs instead of ramdisk, fwiw.
>
> if all I got is init
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:43:00AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > Hello Debian m68k porters,
> >
> > Has anyone managed to get icedove and iceweasel to start on real
> > m68k hardware ?
> >
> > This question has something to do with epipha
Steve Langasek wrote:
First, there was a theory that "ramdisk_size" is no longer needed with
2.6.x kernels. That's wrong, unfortunately:
It's right when using initramfs instead of ramdisk, fwiw.
if all I got is initrd.gz and a kernel and I am going to use ataboot
(bootstrap), can I use initr
15 matches
Mail list logo
