Re: m68k release future

2006-10-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:34:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > No, I just like to know what we're trying to achieve before starting to > do anything. > > Okay, so the idea is: > > (a) move m68k from etch to testing-m68k > > (b) automatically promote m68k packages from unstable to testing-m

Bug#396001: apertium overoptimizes

2006-10-29 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Package: apertium Severity: minor Hi, when I build apertium on m68k I get this: m68k-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall -ansi -O3 -o apertium-rehtml apertium-rehtml.o /usr/bin/xsltproc deformat.xsl rtf-format.xml |/usr/bin/flex -Cfer -t >apertium-desrtf.C if m68k-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.

Re: Web registration issue

2006-10-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tried to register my new installation via > > http://www.linux-m68k.org/Registry/Registration.html > > but after filling out all the informatin and hitting the 'Register' > button, I get the following message: > > "Forbidden > You don't have permiss

Re: LCIIIs

2006-10-29 Thread Jules Bean
[I hope you won't be offended if I cc: this back to the list, I think this may be useful to others] Brian Morris wrote: FWIW, someone with a performa475 or quadra605 might benefit from the power supply. it is 20 watt more power rated, althouth the same size. adding memory, bigger drives, networ