On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:21:24PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> well we haven't had much testing here on 2.6 either, making this big jump.
It's true 2.6 hasn't been solid on 68k. I know I struggle to find the
time to work on it.
> my machine, is lcIII/performa450, is supposed to be somewhat simil
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think this was a IIfx
or a machine with Sonic ethernet. It's possible the 5380 core code has
suffered from bitrot. It's mostly just used by 68k. The only x86 uses
are some old cards that I really doubt get much testing on 2.6.
well we haven't ha
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:06:37PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > i interpreted this exactly that way. the message comes from the scsci
> > controller. the controller is recieving commanf code 54 which besides
> > being an optional command (not part of the standard list) is not even
> > appropri
Emperor's peace you want to offer neither could be at all of Emperor to supply light this is put his hoarsened voice Great
mmomhvux.gif
Description: GIF image
> > > i did try this, i found it was behaving rather unpredictably, once i
> > > got an error
> > > 54 not understood,
> >
> > ??? The above should go into the kernel options line of the booter, in
> > case I didn't make this clear before. "54 not understood" is nothing I
> > would expect the kerne
5 matches
Mail list logo
