Re: [buildd] gcj-4.1 build-deps aargh

2006-10-03 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I uploaded those packages anyway, which will probably allows us to build a > couple more packages? Yes, they should, e.g. gjdoc will build now, but it won't really work yet, but a new release shouldn't be too far away and considering the ba

Re: [PATCH] m68k Atari: experimental atafb support

2006-10-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > "Michael" == Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Michael> Current state of atafb follows inlined (vger ate the last > > Michael> BASE64 attachment, sorry). Replaces my previous patch,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k]

2006-10-03 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:25:36AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Please remove the following m68k binary packages from unstable. > > > > Discussion about this happened here: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2

Re: [buildd] gcj-4.1 build-deps aargh

2006-10-03 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:16:01PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > and this one failure is not even specific to m68k, so this means we have > now better java support than arm or mips! Huzzah for Roman! -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> s

Re: [PATCH] m68k Atari: experimental atafb support

2006-10-03 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Current state of atafb follows inlined (vger ate the last Michael> BASE64 attachment, sorry). Replaces my previous patch, now Michael> supports monochrome, 16 and 256 bit VGA mode. Please test. "Signed-off-by: " please o

Re: [buildd] gcj-4.1 build-deps aargh

2006-10-03 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:16:01PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > > and this one failure is not even specific to m68k, so this means we have > now better java support than arm or mips! Great :-) I uploaded those packages anyway, which will probably allows us to build a couple more packages? Chri

Re: [buildd] gcj-4.1 build-deps aargh

2006-10-03 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Oct 3 12:43:43 buildd-mail: Error: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14j1(unstable) > check_state(Building Install-Wait Reupload-Wait): version 4.1.1-15 registered > as Building > > After 114 hours building... Well, let's hope the other build finishes befor

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#362590: FTBFS on m68k]

2006-10-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
tags 363424 moreinfo thanks On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:25:36AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Please remove the following m68k binary packages from unstable. > > Discussion about this happened here: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2006/04/msg00021.html > > xpilot-ng-client-x11_1:4.7.2-

Re: [PATCH] m68k Atari: experimental atafb support

2006-10-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > "Michael" == Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael> Current state of atafb follows inlined (vger ate the last > Michael> BASE64 attachment, sorry). Replaces my previous patch, now > Michael> supports monochrome, 16 and 256 bit VGA m

Re: [buildd] gcj-4.1 build-deps aargh

2006-10-03 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 01:30:23PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > Oct 3 12:43:43 buildd-mail: Error: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14j1(unstable) > > check_state(Building Install-Wait Reupload-Wait): version 4.1.1-15 > > registered as Building > > After 114 hours building... > > Would it make sense to

Re: [buildd] gcj-4.1 build-deps aargh

2006-10-03 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
> Oct 3 12:43:43 buildd-mail: Error: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14j1(unstable) > check_state(Building Install-Wait Reupload-Wait): version 4.1.1-15 registered > as Building > After 114 hours building... Would it make sense to build that on akire manually? -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-274

Re: [buildd] gcj-4.1 build-deps aargh

2006-10-03 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:54:55AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:22:23PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:44:20AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Aargh! > > > > > > gcj-4.1 build-deps on xulrunner. > > > > > > xulrunner build-