Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:49:21AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
Even if you still think that doing this early rather
Hi dear sir:
I am Candy,it is very nice to have a chance to contact with you, allow me to introduce our company in brief, our company is one of the biggest optical passive component plants in China, we mainly produce fiber patchcords, fiber adaptors, fiber attenuators and so on,at the same
well if our kernels work and i am able
to get through this lisp book i am reading
then maybe i can help, at least test it out.
brian
(meanwhile i may as well install the sarge
version, i guess)
On 9/23/06, Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:38:30PM -0700, Br
well you can read the recent list archives about debian-68k,
its a bit chaotic right now.
i have been using gnustep a little on powerpc, and building
some upstream, or trying to. because of much recent advances
in gnustep - a pleasant surprise - etch at least is required to
have recent gnustep ap
Hi all,
I'm a long-time 68k user, especially with debian, since it was my first
linux computer back then and the same IIfx is still faithfully working.
I followed the linux-mac68k list for a long time, but apparently it
"died off" and nobody knows who managed the computer thus I was advised
t
> > > Nice. Is the keyboard working as well or is this kernel actually usable on
> > > the majority of our macs?
> >
> > I just tried -9 on my C650 and touching a key kills everything. The 6.1
> > kernel you built works great. I'm rather hoping to get network-console
> > in d-i working this week.
>
On Friday 22 September 2006 16:39, Grant Grundler wrote:
> I didn't see anything for parisc (HPPA).
> I don't know of any problems with initramfs on parisc.
> but I don't expect any surprises from the kernel on that.
Maybe I was not clear enough on this. The original text was:
* type of initrd use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/06 07:53, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> gcc-4.0 was extremly brittle and should never has been made the default
>> compiler in sid. It was not working correctly on i386 let alone on
>> others platforms. I don't remember a similar issue with any ot
We're not too stressed needs-build wise ATM so I'll take hobbes offline to
test the current 2.6.17 kernel on the real hardware.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> gcc-4.0 was extremly brittle and should never has been made the default
> compiler in sid. It was not working correctly on i386 let alone on
> others platforms. I don't remember a similar issue with any other sid
> compiler. I spent more working around compiler issues than I ever had
> to.
>
> I
On Saturday 23 September 2006 14:26, you wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > It was a bug in libgc and there is finally a new release, as soon
> > > as it's installed it, it should work again.
> >
> > Is there a bug#? In which version was it fixed?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Saturday 23 September 2006 13:45, you wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > During the builds of debian-installer for the last stable point
> > release, you did tracing of the w3m segfaults during the building of
> > the installation guide.
>
> It was a bug in libgc and there is fin
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:07:36PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Moreover, there's the matter that this leaves no time for an archive-wide
> > check for toolchain /regressions/. As we enter the freeze, i386 and amd64
> > will most likely do whole-arc
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Moreover, there's the matter that this leaves no time for an archive-wide
> check for toolchain /regressions/. As we enter the freeze, i386 and amd64
> will most likely do whole-archive rebuilds as a consistency check; if m68k's
> toolchain is cha
(Please CC me; I'm not subscribed)
Hi all,
During the builds of debian-installer for the last stable point release,
you did tracing of the w3m segfaults during the building of the
installation guide.
I don't think I ever saw what the reasons were and if a BR was filed.
As it is likely that we
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:55:18PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> netbsd has emacs21 and xemacs21 running under
> mac68k (its on their download page as of Now).
iirc the change that broke xemacs for m68k-linux was somewhere
between 21.1.10 and 21.1.14, what versions run on netbsd?
Regards
Richard
16 matches
Mail list logo
