Re: gcc status

2006-09-22 Thread Brian Morris
it says 21.4 there. that is the mass build a guy made in april for mac68k. it is not necessarily tested, but it did build. ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/packages/packages-2006Q1/NetBSD-3.0/m68k/editors/ On 9/22/06, Richard Zidlicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:55:18PM

Re: [PATCH] m68k Atari: experimental atafb support

2006-09-22 Thread Petr Stehlik
Michael Schmitz píše v Pá 22. 09. 2006 v 18:55 +0200: > regardless of current distribution status, here's my experimental patch > for atafb in 2.6.17. The result looks the same on real hardware (Falcon) > as it does on the ARAnyM emulator. Cool! Great work, Michael! > characters get smeared acro

Re: [PATCH] m68k Atari: experimental atafb support

2006-09-22 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:55:52PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Note to CT60 users: I had to disable setting any keyboard ACIA bits except > ACIA_RESET or I'd get an access fault on the ACIA - just like I reported > for 2.6.13. Look at arch/m68k/atari/config.c and arch/m68k/atari/atakeyb.c > to

Re: [D-I] mass kernel udeb update and preparations for RC1

2006-09-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > (Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.) > > /me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail > The first part is mostly information (though a "cool" or "thanks" would be > appreciated), bu

Re: Compromise between ignoring archs and manual approval of updates

2006-09-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:49:21AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > > >On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > > > >>Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > >> > >> > >>>Even if you still think that doing this early rather than late is > >>>neces

Re: [D-I] mass kernel udeb update and preparations for RC1

2006-09-22 Thread Frans Pop
(Reply-to set to debian-boot; please only add relevant port if needed.) /me wonders why there have been almost no reactions to this mail The first part is mostly information (though a "cool" or "thanks" would be appreciated), but the second part has some issues that need attention. Have D-I port

Re: linux 2.6.18

2006-09-22 Thread Michael Schmitz
> linux 2.6.18 has been released yesterday, this might be the kernel to ship > with etch. The m68k patches are not ready yet, so I can not build m68k > images yet. But once they are ready, I'd like to upload as soon as possible. > As a result of the recent tests, are there any changes in the config

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

2006-09-22 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:47:47PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Eh, what are you talking about? Debian is getting way better than it > used to be, at least that's the impression I have. If you have another > opinion, please share that one with me (but that's off-topic for > debian-release as well