Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > Please try this kernel > > > > http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/linux-image/linux-image-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6.1_m68k.deb > > Yeah, it seems we just gaine

Re: etch on aranym, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Finn Thain wrote: > > > > difficult to reproduce the bug? > > > It's kinda random. > > > > In that case, it might be necessary to make the scheduler behave in a > > more derministic way (maybe realtime priority?). Single-user mode > > would help. >

Re: debian-installer/sarge

On Friday 18 August 2006 00:24, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Wouters mail was the first official request for help with this package. That's not completely fair. I know that Dann Frazier has done several requests for this last week, though maybe not on the 68k list. Anyway, don't tell me that t

Re: debian-installer/sarge

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:29:42PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > It takes about five hours to do the dailies on my Quadra 950. > > akire's up and not busy, that's probably the place to do it. > > The problem is that for an official build for Sarge, you also need to > bui

Re: debian-installer/sarge

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > It takes about five hours to do the dailies on my Quadra 950. > akire's up and not busy, that's probably the place to do it. The problem is that for an official build for Sarge, you also need to build the installation guide and all its translations, and that takes way

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Please try this kernel > > http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/linux-image/linux-image-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6.1_m68k.deb Yeah, it seems we just gained some time. About one year so... Nevertheless, it would be good to

Re: debian-installer/sarge

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone who's got an m68k sarge system or chroot running in which he > could build debian-installer? I started a build on aahz, which is still running stable. However, there is still a build of octave2.9 running in parallel

Re: debian-installer/sarge

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone who's got an m68k sarge system or chroot running in which he > could build debian-installer? > > It needs to be done; I'm currently building it on quickstep, but by the > rate we're going, it could take a few days.

debian-installer/sarge

Hi, Anyone who's got an m68k sarge system or chroot running in which he could build debian-installer? It needs to be done; I'm currently building it on quickstep, but by the rate we're going, it could take a few days. Quickstep is a 25Mhz (slow) Mac (also slow), probably a fast amiga or one of th

Re: etch on aranym, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

Finn Thain wrote: difficult to reproduce the bug? It's kinda random. In that case, it might be necessary to make the scheduler behave in a more derministic way (maybe realtime priority?). Single-user mode would help. I could try upgrading the sarge to etch in single-user mode to see if it

[buildd] Re: gcc status

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 03:54:21PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > Matthias is working on a new gcc upload, which should appear later this > week and which will contain a number of m68k related bug fixes, so it > would be quite important to get it as soon as possible to the buildd. > > It f

Re: etch on aranym, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Petr Stehlik wrote: > > > >From "should work", I take it that no out-of-tree patches are > > > >required... > > that is correct - no ARAnyM specific patches are required for booting > Atari kernel on ARAnyM. But if you add one small patch you get real > power-off and als

Re: etch on aranym, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

> > 2.4.27 was the 2.4.x kernel for Atari at the time when I was playing with > > that > > (September 2005). If there is a newer 2.4.x kernel then it should work. > > >From "should work", I take it that no out-of-tree patches are required... > but which tree should work? Are you referring to mainl

Re: etch on aranym, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

Michael Schmitz wrote: 2.4.27 was the 2.4.x kernel for Atari at the time when I was playing with that (September 2005). If there is a newer 2.4.x kernel then it should work. >From "should work", I take it that no out-of-tree patches are required... that is correct - no ARAnyM specific patche