heartbeat 1.2.5-1 FTBFS on m68k

2006-08-14 Thread Horms
Hi, I am looking at a curious build problem for the heartbeat package which I maintain. The problem only seems to manifest on m68k, and does not seem to manifiest in the heartbeat-2 package, which is largely similar. The problem seems to have started with the upload of heartbeat 1.2.4-14, which w

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:09:38AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > Personally, I'm curious to see what happens when you boot a Q9x0 with a > > kernel having no IOP ADB driver. I don't have a Q9x0 to try that, and the > > debian kernels all

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:18:14PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > Not sure the RTC ever worked, but the serial drivers used to. [snip] > > > > > > It appears that there is no way to collect a crash dump on this arch :-( > > > > Not at this ea

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > 2.2 and 2.4 kernels will not be part of etch. They will be removed from > the installer and there will no be (official) kernel/linux images in > etch. We discussed this here a while ago, and we decided to drop 2.2. > and 2.4 from d-i to make

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > 2.2 and 2.4 kernels will not be part of etch. They will be removed from the > installer and there will no be (official) kernel/linux images in etch. We > discussed this here a while ago, and we decided to drop 2.2. and 2.4 from > d-i to make

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > What problems would that be? Toolchain problems don't solve itself and > > > the build speed doesn't seem to the biggest problem. > > [...embedded...] > > > The problem is

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:18:14PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Not sure the RTC ever worked, but the serial drivers used to. > > I've tried a few different approaches to debugging this, like reverting > > changes made to the mac68k ancestors, comparing it to the CUDA ADB driver, > > adding

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:16:20PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:53:12PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > > How soon? We'll need a little advance warning here. Getting Mac and Atari > > > support for 2.6 i

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:53:12PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > How soon? We'll need a little advance warning here. Getting Mac and Atari > > support for 2.6 into shape won't happen overnight. TLS support is also not existing yet, so it

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > number of builds on 2.2 kernels. If our macs cannot run 2.6, we will > > need to find replacement for these somehow. We do not have the surplus > > buildd power to just forget about the 2.2-running machines and > > continue with those machines that do run 2.6. > > glibc might force us s

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:53:12PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > How soon? We'll need a little advance warning here. Getting Mac and Atari > support for 2.6 into shape won't happen overnight. I'm not even sure all > Amiga varieties can run 2.6 (crest doesn't). What's the issue with crest? --

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Not sure the RTC ever worked, but the serial drivers used to. > > RTC used to work in 2.2. The m68k repo tells me that it was deliberately > left in a broken state (because of ADB breakage? build failure?). I'm sure The RTC hangs off the ADB or ADB-VIA, so thats the reason, perhaps. > it can

Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > What problems would that be? Toolchain problems don't solve itself and > > the build speed doesn't seem to the biggest problem. > [...embedded...] > > The problem is that these users are not really visible, could Debian/CF > > meet the release

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:09:38AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > Personally, I'm curious to see what happens when you boot a Q9x0 with a > kernel having no IOP ADB driver. I don't have a Q9x0 to try that, and the > debian kernels all have IOP ADB (I guess that is because it works on the > IIfx).

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > it used to be the case that half of them were macs, but this time is > > > past, there are "only" five: 2 840AV, 2 Quadra 950, one Quadra 650. > > > For experimental, I have one more Quadra 950 and a Centris 650. > > > > Well, it's not pretty,

Re: buildd macs, was Re: [buildd] Etch?

2006-08-14 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > it used to be the case that half of them were macs, but this time is > > past, there are "only" five: 2 840AV, 2 Quadra 950, one Quadra 650. For > > experimental, I have one more Quadra 950 and a Centris 650. > > Well, it's not pretty, but I can give you advance warning of the issues > on those