Re: Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Roger Leigh
> > Hi! > > >> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with > > current version and gcc-3.2 > Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? I'm not sure if the 3.2 is a typo. It fails reproducibly (4 times now) with the current unstable sources (no modification

Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Hi! > > Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with current > version and gcc-3.2 Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? -f -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:03:57AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with current > > version and gcc-3.2 > Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? Sorry, I meant the hardcoded gcc-3.4... -- Ciao...//

glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with current version and gcc-3.2 and b) with current version and 4.1. Well, I just came to a): /build/glibc/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/m68k-libc/iconv/strtab.o: In function trtabinit': /build/glibc/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/glibc-2.3.6

Re: [buildd] help with gmp

2006-07-10 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 07:06:24PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 08:29:39PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 01:25:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > I'd guess the root bug here is that /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a is being > > > used > > > ins