On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:30:08PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> found 340871 2.3.6-14
> reopen 340871
> thanks
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Due to some crossed wires, probably on my part, the fix for this bug
> was broken. The patch is in two parts: the __THROW define and the use
> of __THROW. The current
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:29:24PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I know, but I think we should try to get the fixed glibc uploaded asap
> because a breakage in math.h is a rather serious problem.
I'm all for it! About six packages which currently fail should build
when this gets fixed. Getting
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:16:47AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:00:45PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > As you know, due to bug #356045 in libc6-dev, it is not possible to
> > compile a program that #include with -O and above.
> >
> > This behaviour occurs in p
It looks like we have a whole collection of runtime segfaults and such.
The problem continues even in gcc-4.1.1-5. If anyone wants to take a
swing, here's a selection.
aptitude_0.4.1-1.1 check-TESTS test: Illegal Instruction
drscheme_1:301-15 ./install Segmentation fault
emacs-snapshot_1:2006062
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:00:45PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> As you know, due to bug #356045 in libc6-dev, it is not possible to
> compile a program that #include with -O and above.
>
> This behaviour occurs in particular in the sid chroot of crest, making
> impossible to test-build some pa
Dear Debian-m68k porters,
As you know, due to bug #356045 in libc6-dev, it is not possible to
compile a program that #include with -O and above.
This behaviour occurs in particular in the sid chroot of crest, making
impossible to test-build some packages there.
I would like to investigate the b
6 matches
Mail list logo
