Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:58:10AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Could someone please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates on a > machine with more RAM than q650? q650 only has 64 MB according to > buildd.net, and it died at the very end of the build with this error: Meanwhile, I've st

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:20:10AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > > > OK, thank you! (Cool, I didn't know you could put 512 MB on a 68k > > > > machine.) > > > > > > 68k has 4

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > (Not sure the CT60 can address that much RAM in a single slot. If not, > > someone would have to design a RAM expansion for the bus extender slot > > that's still unused, with the ethernet card not ready yet). > IIRC, the Amig

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:20:10AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > > OK, thank you! (Cool, I didn't know you could put 512 MB on a 68k > > > machine.) > > > > 68k has 4G address space, so why not? ;-) > > Sure, why not? Why hasn't anybody come up

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Michael Schmitz
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:20:10AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > OK, thank you! (Cool, I didn't know you could put 512 MB on a 68k > > machine.) > > 68k has 4G address space, so why not? ;-) Sure, why not? Why hasn't anybody come up with 1GB or more 168 pin DIMMs yet? (Not sure the CT60 c

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:20:10AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > OK, thank you! (Cool, I didn't know you could put 512 MB on a 68k > machine.) 68k has 4G address space, so why not? ;-) -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Michael Schmitz wrote: > Kevin McCarty wrote: >>Could someone please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates ... > It died a rather horrible death on top of the OOM error (if that's what > happened) - I got eth0: receive buffer exhausted in a tight loop and the > box basically sat idle since F

Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?

2006-02-01 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Could someone please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates on a > machine with more RAM than q650? q650 only has 64 MB according to > buildd.net, and it died at the very end of the build with this error: > > > set -e ; \ > > [ -d /build/buildd/cernlib-2004.11.04.dfsg/shlib ] || exit 0 ; \

Re: micronic pc-at keyboard adapter for amiga problem in linux

2006-02-01 Thread nzabrod
Thank you very much for support! I figured out this stuff - it's a hardware problem. Ctrl key starts working AFTER pressing "windows" key. May be it's a trouble of my keyb reset circuit - I have pcmcia fix installed and may be it's not working =). The second idea - controller autodetects keyboard