Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

2005-05-01 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:44:59PM +0200, Haakon Innerdal wrote: > On Sun, 1 May 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Haakon Innerdal wrote: > Call Trace: [<00014c78>] _060_fpsp_effadd+0xbc20/0xd518 > [<0001afa8>] printk+0x0/0xee > [<00269aba>] free_all_bootmem+0xa/0x10

Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

2005-05-01 Thread Haakon Innerdal
On Sun, 1 May 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Haakon Innerdal wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:32:32PM +0200, Haakon Innerdal wrote: > > > > Is there any special magic to apply if I want to run a 2.6.x-amiga > > >

Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

2005-05-01 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:16AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:06:07AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > Should I try to ensure that the 2.6-kernel is built with > > > > gcc-2.95? is

Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

2005-05-01 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:06:07AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > Should I try to ensure that the 2.6-kernel is built with gcc-2.95? is it > > > even possible to build 2.6.x with gcc-2.95? (I could try, but each kernel

Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

2005-05-01 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Should I try to ensure that the 2.6-kernel is built with gcc-2.95? is it > > even possible to build 2.6.x with gcc-2.95? (I could try, but each kernel > > build is taking about half a day...) > > IIRC I built 2.6 with gc

Re: 2.6.x-amiga kernel + misc.

2005-05-01 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Haakon Innerdal wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:32:32PM +0200, Haakon Innerdal wrote: > > > Is there any special magic to apply if I want to run a 2.6.x-amiga kernel? > > > (2.6.8-4 was the latest I tried) > > > > > > F