On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Haakon Innerdal wrote:
> Should I try to ensure that the 2.6-kernel is built with gcc-2.95? is it
> even possible to build 2.6.x with gcc-2.95? (I could try, but each kernel
> build is taking about half a day...)
Yes, 2.6 can be built with gcc 2.95 (I'm using a cross 2.95.2
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:32:32PM +0200, Haakon Innerdal wrote:
> Hi gentlemen,
>
> Is there any special magic to apply if I want to run a 2.6.x-amiga kernel?
> (2.6.8-4 was the latest I tried)
>
> First of all, the default built kernel 2.6.8-amiga, is to big for
> amiboot-5.6.
> Any custom bu
Hi gentlemen,
Is there any special magic to apply if I want to run a 2.6.x-amiga kernel?
(2.6.8-4 was the latest I tried)
First of all, the default built kernel 2.6.8-amiga, is to big for
amiboot-5.6.
Any custom built kernel that is accepted in terms of size, only results in
a grey screen, not
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:21:44PM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>
> Have you asked the porter lists? The last three non-free packages
that I
> asked people to build for RC bugfixes were all brought up-to-date
4 matches
Mail list logo
