Your Codiene Refill is now Available Please Verify Info
http://ota.fixcentr4l.net/dameds
Customer #: 283856298
Re-Fill #: 908692
User Name : debian-java@lists.debian.org
http://jqh.fixcentr4l.net/dameds
There's a thread in debian-68k about removing Dirk
Eddelbuettel's octave2.1, quantlib, r-base from m68k, at his
request. This will take some other packages with it.
http://bugs.debian.org/167780 for more info.
I jumped the gun on this because I think it's the direction
we should be going in. I'l
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > >
> > > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in the matter , then I
> > > would like
> > > | > to request the same for the following packages:
> > > | >
> > > | >octave2.1, quantlib, r-base
> > > | >
> > > | > for the
> > > | >
> > > | >arm, m68k
Guys:
| >
| > architectures. I have spent *way* too much fscking special requests for
| > these smaller + older architecture which are, quite simply, mismatched for
| > these numerically-focussed applications and environments.
|
| Please convince a porter for those architectures to add the r
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:39:15AM -0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#167780: 0.3.4 is in testing]
> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux site
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Newsgroups: local.debian-68k
>
> >
> > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#167780: 0.3.4 is in testing]
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux site
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Newsgroups: local.debian-68k
>
> | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in the matter , then I would
> like
> | > to request the same for the follow
If anyone would like to comment, please do so to the bug. Note that I'm
not subscribed to either of these two lists.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:10:02 -0500
To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Di
7 matches
Mail list logo
