Re: Please check status of cernlib 2004.11.04-3 on kullervo

2005-03-31 Thread Rick Younie
Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Hi m68k folks, > > Could someone please poke kullervo to see what the status of cernlib on > m68k is? It's been listed as "Building" since March 21st. Even cernlib > doesn't take _that_ long to compile :-) This is kind of a high-priority > upload since it fixes local s

Please check status of cernlib 2004.11.04-3 on kullervo

2005-03-31 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi m68k folks, Could someone please poke kullervo to see what the status of cernlib on m68k is? It's been listed as "Building" since March 21st. Even cernlib doesn't take _that_ long to compile :-) This is kind of a high-priority upload since it fixes local security issues. Thanks very much,

Re: missing evolution-data-server build on m68k (zot)

2005-03-31 Thread Rick Younie
Steve Langasek wrote: > > ... > >> Would've helped had you sent this to m68k-build instead of the other >> list :-) > > Sorry, I vaguely recall discussion about having porters use this list > instead of the m68k-buildd list -- did I misinterpret that discussion, or > was the outcome different th

Re: missing evolution-data-server build on m68k (zot)

2005-03-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:33:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:10:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hey folks, > > buildd.debian.org lists evolution-data-server as building on m68k since Mar > > 16: > > gnome/evolution-data-server_1.0.4-1: Building by buildd_m

Re: missing evolution-data-server build on m68k (zot)

2005-03-31 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:10:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hey folks, > > buildd.debian.org lists evolution-data-server as building on m68k since Mar > 16: > > gnome/evolution-data-server_1.0.4-1: Building by buildd_m68k-zot > [optional:out-of-date] > Previous state was Needs-Build