Re: apt-get problems on Quadra 610

2004-09-16 Thread Barry Skidmore
On Thursday, September 16 2004 at 13:47 PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I hope I'm in the right list for this kind of question... > > Okay, so I'm a Mac user who has decided to get his feet wet > in linux. Totally new to this so if you've answered this > question a thousand times please bea

Re: Results of various tests with MVME167

2004-09-16 Thread gerard klaver
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 20:18, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Kars de Jong wrote: > > > > > I'll try the MVME147 kernels tomorrow as well. > > > > Sorry, didn't have time for that. > > > > Anyway, I'm going on holiday for the next 2 1/2 weeks, so I leave y

apt-get problems on Quadra 610

2004-09-16 Thread krempel
I hope I'm in the right list for this kind of question... Okay, so I'm a Mac user who has decided to get his feet wet in linux. Totally new to this so if you've answered this question a thousand times please bear with me. I have several old Macs lying around and I thought I'd start with the old

Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-09-16 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:23:08AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I'm updating the syscall table for m68k... > > > > Below is a patch that adds all syscalls that m68k is currently lacking > > (compared to ia32). However, I'm wondering whether w

Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-09-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I'm updating the syscall table for m68k... > > Below is a patch that adds all syscalls that m68k is currently lacking > (compared to ia32). However, I'm wondering whether we need all of them: > - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP? >