Re: Web Server on Mac SE/30

2004-09-13 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 20:14 -0500, Barry Skidmore wrote: > I have had Debian (woody) running on this Mac SE/30 for > some time now, and decided to try establishing a small > web site using Apache. > > The site is now up: http://www.macconnection.net > > The purpose of the site is just to provide

Web Server on Mac SE/30

2004-09-13 Thread Barry Skidmore
I have had Debian (woody) running on this Mac SE/30 for some time now, and decided to try establishing a small web site using Apache. The site is now up: http://www.macconnection.net The purpose of the site is just to provide some information and links to documentation and files involved in insta

Re: Special Offer: Long Distance At No Cost

2004-09-13 Thread August Prost
Remove from future mailings [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: openh323 picked before pwlib by buildd

2004-09-13 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:42:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:18:48PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > > please someone put openh323 back on dep-wait against pwlib>=1.6.6.4-4. > > The buildd tried building with the old pwlib and is currently doing the > > new one (buildi

Re: openh323 picked before pwlib by buildd

2004-09-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:18:48PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > please someone put openh323 back on dep-wait against pwlib>=1.6.6.4-4. > The buildd tried building with the old pwlib and is currently doing the > new one (building on crest). This is not the contact address for build daemons; you w

openh323 picked before pwlib by buildd

2004-09-13 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi, please someone put openh323 back on dep-wait against pwlib>=1.6.6.4-4. The buildd tried building with the old pwlib and is currently doing the new one (building on crest). Thanks! -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-09-13 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:17:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > - What about sys_vserver()? > > > > I would be happy

Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

2004-09-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > - What about sys_vserver()? > > I would be happy to add a syscall reservation > to the list of already reserved syscalls for > i3