Ron,
Good to know.
So the front runner combination at this point is xfce and Dillo.
Tony
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 11:26 +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, To
I have a VME box with a MVME 162-222 and a MVME 320B-1. The 162 I
know something about but I know very little about the 320B.
The 162 does not have disk support so the 320B would have to provide the
disk
interface.
Does the Debian distribution for the 162 have the "smarts" to interface
with the
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 11:26 +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
[snip]
> > If you really want some lightweight window manager, try twm.
Finn,
Nice tips, I will check it out.
Tony
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
> > > Does anyone know of a light weight desktop that I can install on my old
> > > Quadra7
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 00:22 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:07:10PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
> > Wouter,
> >
> > thanks, I will try and see if I can get it to work on my system. Is there a
> > light weight desktop you would recommend to go along with it?
>
> Why do yo
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
> > > Does anyone know of a light weight desktop that I can install on my old
> > > Quadra700? I have a 100mb drive and a 230mb drive
Joel,
Thanks for the tips. I am still fighting with getting base deb installed,
so I will keep this around for when I get that far.
Tony
I'm using IceWM on a Qudra 840av w/128M RAM and a 4G HD -- not
that I think you'd need such hardware to run it. It's pretty quick and I
don't think i
I'm using IceWM on a Qudra 840av w/128M RAM and a 4G HD -- not that I
think you'd need such hardware to run it. It's pretty quick and I don't think
its hard disk footprint is too enormous though I don't remember exactly how big
it is. It's a little more featureful than twm but not near
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:07:10PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
> Wouter,
>
> thanks, I will try and see if I can get it to work on my system. Is there a
> light weight desktop you would recommend to go along with it?
Why do you need a full desktop if all you want to do is browse the web?
Desktops
Wouter,
thanks, I will try and see if I can get it to work on my system. Is there a
light weight desktop you would recommend to go along with it?
Tony
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a lig
Hello,
Is it possible to get a 2.6 kernel for m68k or the "general" kernel from
debian is OK ?
Are there some pre-requisite to compile it ? (gcc or binutils version
for example).
If it is possible I will try to compile (and run ?) it on my A2000/060.
Regards
JP Pozzi
--
Storm66 <[EMAIL PROTEC
V Po, 16. 08. 2004 v 23:37, Christian T. Steigies píše:
> spurious k there (from Stehlik?). Yup, you did, does that count as a buffer
> overflow or is TOS just overwriting the last char on a 80 char screen?
TOS has two modes of the VT52 terminal in TOS - either it wraps long
text to new line or it
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:05:10PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote:
>
> - new bootstrap works with FastRAM on Centurbo2 and Afterburner040 cards
> properly.
Works on my Falcon, sorry no mem or powersupply yet to get the CT60 going.
The 2.4.27 kernel works as well, entering lowmem mode in the installer
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a light weight desktop that I can install on my old
> > Quadra700? I have a 100mb drive and a 230mb drive.
> >
> > I know that the gnome desktop takes a lot
Hi,
I have just finished the planned changes to atari-bootstrap. I may write
a more detailed description later if you wish but here is a short
summary:
- new bootstrap loads ramdisk into TT/FastRAM by default which fixes all
sorts of problems with ST-RAM swap, with videoram full of garbage and
fa
Ron,
I have 36mb of RAM. It is the hard drive space that is the main concern.
Can you tell me what are the minimum options I can choose during the debian
install of packages to get a desktop and the Dillo browser and fit it all
on the drives I have?
Tony
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, Tony P
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 13:21 -0600, Tony Pitman wrote:
> Does anyone know of a light weight desktop that I can install on my old
> Quadra700? I have a 100mb drive and a 230mb drive.
>
> I know that the gnome desktop takes a lot of room.
>
> All I want to do is browse the Internet with this comput
Does anyone know of a light weight desktop that I can install on my old
Quadra700? I have a 100mb drive and a 230mb drive.
I know that the gnome desktop takes a lot of room.
All I want to do is browse the Internet with this computer. Nothing more.
Tony Pitman
Shatalmic Company
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 10:12:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Looking at the linux-m68k.org page, they only recommend 2.4.0 and 2.4.1
> > which is obviously not an option (for security reasons). So it looks
>
> That's obsolete. If you want 2.4,
Hi Geert,
Am Mo, den 16.08.2004 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven um 10:12:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Looking at the linux-m68k.org page, they only recommend 2.4.0 and 2.4.1
> > which is obviously not an option (for security reasons). So it looks
>
> That's obsolete. If you want 2.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Looking at the linux-m68k.org page, they only recommend 2.4.0 and 2.4.1
> which is obviously not an option (for security reasons). So it looks
That's obsolete. If you want 2.4, I recommend 2.4.27 (unless Mac or Atari and
2.4.27 doesn't work).
BTW, non-m
Hi Finn,
> I just remembered where I saw this before -- nptl glibc under a non-redhat
> 2.4 kernel. Also, on m68k, I saw this failure when I was booting a kernel
> with an ELF binfmt module not compiled into the kernel, and the kernel
> unable to load it. You might hit this with 2.6 kernels if
> m
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is on a stock install because I don't have it hooked to the Internet
> to get updates with. That is because I don't have a network card, and I
> can't find the PLIP module. Where is it and how can I get my hands on it.
> (2) Install the plip mo
23 matches
Mail list logo
