Re: Please reschedule m68k build for tulip

2004-03-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 10:07:11PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > Tulip did not build on March 4th because of a bug with qt's uic. Since the > same problem was solved on other archs some time ago, I suppose it'd be a > good time to rebuild on 68k ? > > Log was: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.ph

Re: ppp 2.4.2+20040202-1 on m68k

2004-03-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040318 22:55]: > Excuse for ppp > > * 17 days old (needed 5 days) > * out of date on m68k: ppp (from 2.4.2+20031127-2) > * Not considered > > base/ppp_2.4.2+20040202-1: Needs-Build [optional:out-of-date] > Previous state was Building until 2004 M

Re: ppp 2.4.2+20040202-1 on m68k

2004-03-18 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 10:47:21PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Excuse for ppp > * 17 days old (needed 5 days) > * out of date on m68k: ppp (from 2.4.2+20031127-2) > * Not considered > base/ppp_2.4.2+20040202-1: Needs-Build [optional:out-of-date] > Previous state was Building until 2

Please reschedule m68k build for tulip

2004-03-18 Thread Yann Dirson
Tulip did not build on March 4th because of a bug with qt's uic. Since the same problem was solved on other archs some time ago, I suppose it'd be a good time to rebuild on 68k ? Log was: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=tulip&ver=1.2.5-4&arch=m68k&stamp=1078386235&file=log&as=raw Regard

ppp 2.4.2+20040202-1 on m68k

2004-03-18 Thread Marco d'Itri
Excuse for ppp * 17 days old (needed 5 days) * out of date on m68k: ppp (from 2.4.2+20031127-2) * Not considered base/ppp_2.4.2+20040202-1: Needs-Build [optional:out-of-date] Previous state was Building until 2004 Mar 18 12:01:40 Please somebody explain me again why I should not