Re: current mozilla or phoenix debs for PPC?

2003-11-28 Thread Chris Tillman
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On 28 Nov 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Even if we did manage to find a good subset of packages which would be > > > 'useful' for our users, I'm sure there will be questio

Re: current mozilla or phoenix debs for PPC?

2003-11-28 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On 28 Nov 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Even if we did manage to find a good subset of packages which would be > > 'useful' for our users, I'm sure there will be questions of disappointed > > users inquiring why packages foo and bar are not avai

Re: current mozilla or phoenix debs for PPC?

2003-11-28 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Op vr 28-11-2003, om 06:40 schreef Scott Holder: > > Chris Tillman wrote: > > > > > Well, it's true we owe our elders respect (as I give a quick glance > > > > > >towards my Mac IIci). But, OTOH, I think the current philosophy of > > >all-or-none may

Re: current mozilla or phoenix debs for PPC?

2003-11-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op vr 28-11-2003, om 06:40 schreef Scott Holder: > Chris Tillman wrote: > > > Well, it's true we owe our elders respect (as I give a quick glance > > > >towards my Mac IIci). But, OTOH, I think the current philosophy of > >all-or-none may be a little too inflexible. Especially as m68k users > >get