On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:32:28AM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > Regarding to the above text from kernel source, it might get parity errors
> > with 10 MHz, but how "dangerous" is this?
> silent data corruption, that may be very nasty. You would need a few
> days of stresstesting to figure ou
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:55:00AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Usually I only get around 2 MB/s from disks, either via scsi0 or scsi1.
> Using a raid0 on scsi0 *or* scsi0 doesn't improve speed at all, but raid0 on
> scsi0 *and* scsi1 do (of course, using sdb and sdc), giving a total speed o
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit :
>
> >To date, no kernels with the feature of sending Linux keycodes exist for
> >m68k-based Macintoshes.
>
> You should perhaps indicate the date and kernel version this
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:24:05AM -0800, Brett Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > Couldn't you simply point people to
> > http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/keycodes, or at least make the entry
> > much shorter in favour of that pointer?
> >
>
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 08:44:50PM -0500, Hank wrote:
> > does anybody have news about this? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I've been subscribed there for years and it nostalgic now! It was
> > macspecific. Can this palce be a successor for those questions I
> > asked there?
> Most of your Mac Linux use
5 matches
Mail list logo
