Re: Quadra 950 Floppy Drive

2003-02-27 Thread Carsten Neumann
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ray Knight wrote: > Sorry I was warning against the use of the -A option for updating as > linux-2_2 is a branch and you'd end up with the HEAD which is 2.4 and > obsolete in that repository. > > For 2.2 code: > CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/linux-mac68k > > Ac

Re: Problems installing Woody from Linux/m68k

2003-02-27 Thread Kars de Jong
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 19:47, Kars de Jong wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 08:22, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > You're welcome. Since you have an installed system, you might be quicker > > off with a compilation you start yourself; however, my offer still > > stands; I'm preparing the chroot right

m68k diff for 2.2.0

2003-02-27 Thread Hank
Hi! Glad to see progress is being made on the mac68k floppy--at least for the Quadra 9xx series. Thanks for the replies on its status and for the work that's been done. Looks like it's getting closer to the day that a Mac will have a working floppy with the Linux kernel. On another issue, I wonder

Re: Quadra 950 Floppy Drive

2003-02-27 Thread Ray Knight
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 20:51, Hank wrote: > > > > > >I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at 2.2.23 > >on sourceforge now so getting the latest 2.2 source should include your > >patch to the floppy driver. I was able to get my IIfx to eject, but I seem > >to recall it

Re: Problems with self-compiled kernel

2003-02-27 Thread Ray Knight
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 14:45, Björn Buske wrote: > "Christian T. Steigies" wrote: > > > I am not sure if you want to use that. You should have a > > /boot/config-2.2.20-atari or similar on your system. That comes from the > > kernel that was installed on your system (by the boot-floppies). Start w

Re: Quadra 950 Floppy Drive

2003-02-27 Thread Ray Knight
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 12:19, Carsten Neumann wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Ray Knight wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:29, Carsten Neumann wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at > > > > 2.2.23 on sou