segmentation fault

I have a sparse knowledge of this that and the other thing but for the most part I am a newbie. I have a 128k linux server and when I command adduser there was and error segmentation fault what should be the cause for this problem and how to fix it I'm looking forward for your help, as what I s

No subject

I have a sparse knowledge of this that and the other thing but for the most part I am a newbie. I have a redhat linux emailserver and when I command adduser there was and error segmentation fault what should be the cause for this problem and how to fix it I'm looking forward for your help, as w

Segmentation Fault

I have a sparse knowledge of this that and the other thing but for the most part I am a newbie. I have a emailserver and when I command adduser there was and error segmentation fault what should be the cause for this problem and how to fix it I'm looking forward for your help, as what I said I

电脑配件供应 debian-68k

ÒÇÍþÏòÄãÎʺÃ! ÎÒ¹«Ë¾³¤ÆÚ´Óʹú¼ÊóÒ×,ΪÍÚ¾òÊг¡Ç±Á¦¡¢À©´ó¾­Óª¹æÄ£,ÒâÔÚ¹óµØ Ñ°ÕÒÁôÒ×´°¿Ú,Ìؽ«´Ë¼Ûͬ±í³Ê¹óµ¥Î»²Î¿¼.ÎÒ˾ÌṩһÁ÷Æ·ÖÊ,Ò»Á÷·þÎñ,ËÍ»õÉÏÃÅ, »õµ½¸¶¿î, ÅúÁí¾ù¿É.»¶Ó­¸÷½çÅóÓÑÀ´µç´¹Ñ¯¼°Ö§³Ö.¶àл!!! ̨ÍåÒÇÍþ¹ú¼ÊóÒ×¹«Ë¾ ÖйúITóÒײ¿ :½ª·á ÇëÎðÖ±½Ó»Ø¸´£¬ÓÐÒâÕßÇëÀ´µç --0135-05917936 Ò

Re: setserial upgrade error in testing

At 12:00 8/1/2002, John Schmidt wrote: I am running testing on an LC III and did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade. setserial was one of the packages that was upgraded. I got the following error: Setting up setserial (2.17-30) ... update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/etc-setserial: file does not exist dp

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())

Greetings, and thanks for your *very helpful* reply! OK, now it is clear to me what is going on. I calling all functions through a variable declared to return a pointer, and some functions are returning a long. I can fix the instances in the existing code fairly easily, but the issue is that the

setserial upgrade error in testing

I am running testing on an LC III and did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade. setserial was one of the packages that was upgraded. I got the following error: Setting up setserial (2.17-30) ... update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/etc-setserial: file does not exist dpkg: error processing setserial (--co

Re: Debian on Amiga: Installationproblem

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:37:55AM +1000, Ross Vumbaca wrote: > > Michael Hugger wrote: > > > English, I hope > > > Hello, > > > I purchased D. L. 3.0 "Woody" m68k for my Amiga 1240/40. After I didn´t > > What is D.L. 3.0? Debian Linux 3.0. Took

Re: Debian on Amiga: Installationproblem

On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:37:55AM +1000, Ross Vumbaca wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Hugger wrote: > > English, I hope > > Hello, > > I purchased D. L. 3.0 "Woody" m68k for my Amiga 1240/40. After I didn´t What is D.L. 3.0? Why "only" 6 CDs, didn't woody come on 7? > > found > > the Amiga-files, I pl

Re: Debian on Amiga: Installationproblem

Hi, Michael Hugger wrote: English, I hope Hello, I purchased D. L. 3.0 "Woody" m68k for my Amiga 1240/40. After I didn´t found the Amiga-files, I placed them on Work:Debian. The linux side is starting, after BusyBox .60.3-pre the screen is printing endless "bog1: don´t know screen type 1". And tha

Debian on Amiga: Installationproblem

English, I hope Hello, I purchased D. L. 3.0 "Woody" m68k for my Amiga 1240/40. After I didn´t found the Amiga-files, I placed them on Work:Debian. The linux side is starting, after BusyBox .60.3-pre the screen is printing endless "bog1: don´t know screen type 1". And that´it. I´m installing Debi

The 2.4.14 kernel

Hi, I am trying to compile the 2.4.14 kernel on my Amiga 3000. It is running Woody. I downloaded the kernel-source-2.4.14 and kernel-patch-2.4.14-m68k package, patched the source tree, configured, and did the usual build steps. The compilation fails while doing the scsi stuff, the error is: scs

Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())

Peter Barada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> >Function return values must be declared (and used) properly on m68k, |> >pointer values are returned in reg a0, ints d0. I would be surprised |> >if m68k was the only arch that gets broken by this.. |> |> Which OS support his ABI? I'd like to know so