Re: Process improvements when excluding attendees from DebConf

2020-04-21 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Daniel (2020.04.21_07:48:54_+) > For me this boils down to: We don't have a pre-agreed, publicly documented > process on how to handle (alleged) violations of the CoC. > > I do not think we should handle (alleged) violations differently whether > they concern a DebConf or not. I'd agree on

Re: Process improvements when excluding attendees from DebConf

2020-04-21 Thread Daniel Lange
Am 21.04.20 um 09:48 schrieb Daniel Lange: Process: https://help.ccc.de/arbitration/index.en.html https://help.ccc.de/arbitration/procedure.en.html Correct link ^

Re: Process improvements when excluding attendees from DebConf

2020-04-21 Thread Daniel Lange
Hi Stefano, thank you very much for the pointer to the discussion (I do not follow -vote) and the thoughtful summary. For me this boils down to: We don't have a pre-agreed, publicly documented process on how to handle (alleged) violations of the CoC. I do not think we should handle (alleged