Hi Daniel (2020.04.21_07:48:54_+)
> For me this boils down to: We don't have a pre-agreed, publicly documented
> process on how to handle (alleged) violations of the CoC.
>
> I do not think we should handle (alleged) violations differently whether
> they concern a DebConf or not.
I'd agree on
Am 21.04.20 um 09:48 schrieb Daniel Lange:
Process: https://help.ccc.de/arbitration/index.en.html
https://help.ccc.de/arbitration/procedure.en.html
Correct link ^
Hi Stefano,
thank you very much for the pointer to the discussion (I do not follow
-vote) and the thoughtful summary.
For me this boils down to: We don't have a pre-agreed, publicly
documented process on how to handle (alleged) violations of the CoC.
I do not think we should handle (alleged
Continuing the process improvements sub-thread from the "DPL blindsides"
thread [0] on debian-vote.
[0]: https://lists.debian.org/68870107-0cf6-da37-fe8f-ec615d923...@debian.org
> > - The DebConf Committee did not know
> > - The DPL did not know
>
> These I think were a lot more problematic. The
