Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf15 Thank you ad. v6

2015-11-13 Thread Daniel Lange
Am 13.11.2015 um 04:35 schrieb Brian Gupta: One minor request. Could you move up HP's logo a hair, and make it a tiny bit bigger to emphasis their unique status as a platinum sponsor? (Don't worry about it if you can't do it without messing with the flow.) If you shift logos, please also move Far

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf15 Thank you ad.

2015-11-13 Thread Tammy Manning
Hi Donald I actually liked the first one with the "O" I think it added interest. ad2 I also liked that there was more info in the ad it had more body, and then the thank-you it gave a little more of an over all story. It also gave a little bit of thought to the sponsors of what their sponsorship a

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf15 Thank you ad. v6

2015-11-13 Thread Donald Norwood
Revision 6 is up. Logos shifted for proper placement in regard to sponsorship. Logo lines 1 and 2 are larger, all other lines smaller 'This year..' font size moved up 2 pts. DC16 logo removed and substituted with information and link to instead. Comments: Email would have been to long to reply

Re: [Debconf-team] About microblogging

2015-11-13 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
El 13/11/15 a las 00:50, martin f krafft escribió: > also sprach Laura Arjona Reina [2015-11-13 07:50 +1300]: >> * Tweet thanking individual sponsors, once they are published in the >> website, using @debconf (Bernelle and Madduck I think they have >> permissions via TweetDeck). > > Team @DebConf

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf15 Thank you ad.

2015-11-13 Thread Donald Norwood
Changes made. Not sure how I missed those horrible typos! Any suggestions for the 'Looking forward to next year' portion? I'm not very happy with it but thought something needed to be there. On 11/12/2015 02:58 AM, Daniel Lange wrote: > Am 11.11.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Donald Norwood: >> http://de

Re: [Debconf-team] About microblogging

2015-11-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Laura Arjona Reina [2015-11-13 13:02 +1300]: > Maybe bits.debian.org has more audience and it's what sponsors > expect? It's not something we promise, btw., so sponsors can't expect it. > I have no strong opinion about which one is better (a bit biased > towards bits because I think