also sprach Patty Langasek [2015-02-22 23:39 +0100]:
> I have ... difficult ... food allergies that I contend with, and
> I find that vegetarian dishes by and large conflict with my
> restricted diet consistently (onions, mushrooms and garbanzo
> beans).
Dear Patty,
it is my impression that th
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:11 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> Food preferences:
> None
> I like to eat meat and fish
> No animal products for me (vegan, strict vegetarian)
> Other / allergies (contact organisers)
After some more thought, I think this phrasing would only lead to
conf
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> * other:
Make that "allergies". We do want to accommodate Patty. We do not want
to accommodate the cookie monster or LCA's bacon man.
Richard
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@list
On 21.02.2015 16:11, martin f krafft wrote:
> At the same time, I think we could try to avoid speaking about
> vegetarians and vegans as "restricted", which has a bit of a
> negative connotation, or so I've been told numerous times now.
Why? It is a restriction of food choice. All of us have foo
also sprach Anthony Towns [2015-02-23 03:25 +0100]:
> given there's a "meat+fish" option, I'd probably read "Food
> preferences: None" as "Don't give me any food, I'll go elsewhere";
> or maybe "I'll eat anything" and expect it to be the same as the
> same as the meat+fish option. If it really mea
Hi
I'm just reading this to pick up for DC16... It may be helpful to think,
what do you REALLY want to know, and could you ask that?
How about a tick box, "would you mind/agree to eat vegetarian meals (no
meat/fish - you choose the words here) for the official/provided conference
meals?"
If not,
Hello,
DebConf attendance is free of charge for everyone, but we have
suggested (and are planning to suggest) to our professional and
corporate attendees to contribute certain amounts towards covering
the conference costs. These are always entirely voluntary
contributions and nothing keeps a corpo
Hi,
Thanks for this impressive work. It's nice how it looks very fair
and very simple at the same time.
On 21/02/15 at 14:46 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> h) In case we need to fund a partial "cohort", we need some way to order
>the cohort. We could sort that cohort according to contribution
Richard Hartmann writes:
> Unless I am mistaken, this is for "we don't have enough money", but if
> we end up with "we have enough/too much money", we could still end up
> with partial cohorts.
Right, this is in some sense a separate problem, but every year we offer
sponsorship to people and som
also sprach David Bremner [2015-02-23 23:15 +0100]:
> Of course we could just estimate the cancelation rate, and build
> that into the budget also. This is slightly riskier, although
> perhaps simpler.
Yay, budgeting. You need a statistics crystal ball for that anyway.
--
.''`. martin f. kra
10 matches
Mail list logo
